The article's claim that bisexual people are "naturally" attracted to both men and women seems to ignore the reality that sexual orientation exists on a spectrum rather than in fixed categories. It's reductive to suggest that bisexuality is simply a matter of "being attracted to both" when the actual experience is far more complex and individual.
The article does acknowledge that bisexuality exists on a spectrum, but it's not necessarily ignoring the fluidity aspect - it's pointing out that people often assume that bisexual people are equally attracted to both genders, when in reality attraction levels can vary significantly. The "naturally" word choice is probably more about how people categorize bisexuality rather than suggesting fixed attraction patterns.
The article's claim that bisexual people are "naturally" attracted to both men and women seems to ignore the reality that sexual orientation exists on a spectrum rather than in fixed categories. It's reductive to suggest that bisexuality is simply a matter of "being attracted to both" when the actual experience is far more complex and individual.
The article does acknowledge that bisexuality exists on a spectrum, but it's not necessarily ignoring the fluidity aspect - it's pointing out that people often assume that bisexual people are equally attracted to both genders, when in reality attraction levels can vary significantly. The "naturally" word choice is probably more about how people categorize bisexuality rather than suggesting fixed attraction patterns.