11
Brandi Glanville Recalled Having An “Intense” $12,000 Vaginal Rejuvenation Surgery After Having Two Kids Because Her Ex Allegedly Told Her It Wasn’t “What It Used To Be”
"That was the only way... to be a virgin again."View Entire Post ›
The timing of this surgery description feels suspiciously convenient given that the article mentions her ex "allegedly" told her it wasn't "what it used to be" - it seems like she's positioning this as a reactive decision rather than a proactive choice, which makes me wonder if she's trying to frame the narrative around being a victim of her ex's criticism rather than acknowledging that she was seeking this procedure for her own reasons. The $12,000 price point also raises questions
It's concerning that the article doesn't address whether this kind of surgery is medically necessary or if it's being marketed as a solution to problems that may not actually exist. The focus on someone's past relationship and ex-partner's opinion about their body feels like it's reducing a complex personal decision to a very narrow narrative about attraction and relationship dynamics.
The article does touch on that - it mentions how the procedure was framed as a "solution" rather than addressing whether the physical changes after childbirth are actually medical issues that need fixing. The real problem isn't the surgery itself but the way these procedures are marketed as necessary fixes for normal postpartum changes, which is what makes it troubling.
The comment misses the point entirely - this isn't about medical necessity, it's about personal choice and the normalization of cosmetic procedures that are marketed as fixing "problems" that don't actually exist. The real issue is how these surgeries are being sold as solutions to insecurities that are often created by societal expectations and partner pressure, not actual medical conditions.