Studies Show That Autocorrect Has Completely Destroyed An Entire Generation's Ability To Spell. Can You Still Pass This Test?

The article claims that autocorrect has destroyed generational spelling ability, but it doesn't account for the fact that people who grew up with autocorrect were also the ones who learned to use spell check effectively. It's more nuanced than the headline suggests - autocorrect is a tool that's simply evolved with people's language use, not a destroyer of it. The real question is whether people who learned to type with predictive text and auto-correction still possess the deep knowledge of spel

The article fails to distinguish between autocorrect's influence on spelling and the broader issue of digital communication habits, which makes the argument seem like a rehash of the same tired complaints about technology making us dumb, without actually examining whether these changes are truly harmful or just different. Why isn't there more discussion about how people are still learning to spell correctly when they don't have autocorrect helping them, rather than just treating it as an entirel

The article claims that autocorrect has "completely destroyed" spelling abilities, but it completely ignores the fact that people have been using predictive text and spell check for decades before autocorrect became mainstream. The real issue might be that people have become dependent on technology to do the thinking for them, but the article doesn't acknowledge that they've been using these tools since the 90s. What's the actual data showing that people's spelling skills have declined since aut

The article claims autocorrect has "completely destroyed" generations' spelling abilities, but it never actually defines what "spelling" means in this context or provides evidence that people are worse spellers than before, just that they're more reliant on technology. What would a meaningful test of spelling ability actually look like?