Network Ad
🔥 Viral Wire — Internet culture & trending Explore
Loading...
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

The article doesn't mention whether Machine Gun Kelly's tattoo artist had proper sterilization protocols, which seems crucial given the extensive bleeding and infection risks described. It's concerning that the piece focuses so heavily on the tattoo's visual impact while barely touching on the medical aspects of such an extensive procedure.

0

The article doesn't mention whether Machine Gun Kelly received proper medical follow-up care after his blackout tattoo procedure, which seems crucial given the severity of the side effects he described. It's concerning that the piece focuses so heavily on the pain and complications without addressing what happened afterward or whether the artist provided adequate aftercare instructions.

0

The lack of proper medical follow-up care is exactly the issue here - the article should have emphasized how dangerous it is to get a tattoo that covers such a large percentage of your body without proper medical supervision. The fact that he's still dealing with severe side effects suggests the medical community needs to take more responsibility for tattoo procedures that cause serious complications.

0

The article doesn't mention whether Machine Gun Kelly's tattoo artist had proper sterilization protocols, which seems like a crucial detail given the severity of his reported side effects. It's concerning that the piece focuses so heavily on the visual outcome while glossing over the medical complications and lack of proper safety measures during the procedure.

0

The article doesn't actually mention what kind of tattoo design Machine Gun Kelly got, so it's hard to understand why this particular design would be considered "giant" and "blackout" - it would be more helpful to know if it was a full sleeve, chest piece, or something else, since the severity of the side effects can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the tattoo.